BetaShares Yield Maximiser ETF (ASX:UMAX) vs S&P 500

Dividend income is an option worth considering for a steady income stream in a low rate environment. So, how has the BetaShares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Fund (ASX: UMAX) achieved a greater yield than the S&P 500 Index?

Unpacking The BetaShares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser

The BetaShares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser is an ETF that holds the companies in the S&P 500 Index but aims to provide a greater dividend return than what would usually be received.

The fund is actively managed and invests in all of the typical large US companies such as Facebook Inc. (NASDAQ: FB), Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) and, Inc (NASDAQ: AMZN).

Over the last five years, the UMAX ETF has returned 12.14% per year after fees. The 12-month trailing dividend yield at 31st August 2019 was 5.4%, which is well above the regular dividend return from the S&P 500 Index. So, how has UMAX achieved a greater yield?

Maximising Dividends

The UMAX ETF pays out the dividends received from the companies held in the portfolio by way of distributions, but also sells call options on the underlying holdings. Basically, a call option is the right to buy an underlying asset at a given price.

The UMAX ETF sells these call options for a premium, which can be paid out to shareholders along with the distributions to increase the dividend yield.

The video below explains options and other derivative securities in more detail:

The effect of this strategy is the potential for both an increase in dividend yield and a decrease in volatility. The call option premiums also provide a partial hedge against a falling market. This strategy is expected to outperform the S&P 500 in falling, flat, or gradually rising markets.

Fees & Risks

The UMAX ETF charges a management fee of 0.79% per year, which is relatively typical for a managed fund.

UMAX is exposed to all the usual risks associated with a S&P 500 ETF, but the call options add some extra risks to this ETF. For example, in a rapidly rising market, the call options that the fund sells will be exercised, which forces the ETF to sell for a price lower than the current market price. The result is a reduced potential for large capital gains, which is somewhat offset by the greater stability of the ETF.

What Now?

This is an interesting ETF and one of the more creative ways of creating stable dividend income. The UMAX ETF does sacrifice some capital gains in a rapidly rising market, so it may not be suitable for investors who are looking for growth. However, if you’re just looking for income, this may be worth considering. Options can be complex though, so be mindful to properly understand what you’re investing in before you buy.

For our number one ETF pick, have a look at the free report below.

Free Dividend ETF Report - Our #1 ASX ETF Pick For 2019

Want to know the name and ticker code of our #1 ASX ETF for 2019? Click here to get free access our ETF expert's investing report, including the name, ticker code and a full analysis of our favourite ETF.

The premium ETF report is entirely free.

No credit card details or payment required.

Legal disclaimer: Chances are, the information you read on the Best ETFs website may contain a mix of factual information and general financial advice. Any information/advice on this website is limited to general financial/investment advice only. The information has not taken into account your specific needs, goals or objectives, so please consider consulting a licenced and trusted adviser before acting on the information. Please read The Rask Group’s Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information and NEVER INVEST IN AN ETF OR MANAGED FUND BEFORE READING THE PRODUCT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (PDS). If you don't read the PDS you're practically flying blind with one arm tied behind your back. This article is authorised by Owen Raszkiewicz of The Rask Group, which is a corporate authorised representative No. 1264179 of Strawman Pty Ltd (ACN: 610 908 211) (AFSL: 501 223).

Disclosure: At the time of writing, Max does not own have a financial interest in any of the companies mentioned.

150 / 163